Top 10 Prop Firms That Allow News Trading in 2026
News trading can be one of the most profitable strategies in funded account trading, yet many proprietary trading firms restrict it due to the volatility and rapid price movements that economic announcements create. If you're a trader who thrives on high-impact events like NFP reports, FOMC decisions, or GDP releases, you need a prop firm that actually supports your trading style rather than penalizing you for it. This article will help you identify which proprietary trading firms welcome news traders, what their specific rules are, and how to compare them based on evaluation requirements, profit splits, and trading conditions.
Finding the right match requires more than just reading a firm's FAQ page. TradingPilot's curated list of the best prop trading firms breaks down each company's stance on news trading, its allowed instruments during high-volatility periods, and any restrictions on holding positions during major announcements.
Summary
-
News trading creates concentrated profit windows that compress days of price movement into minutes, allowing prop traders to capture significant gains without waiting for trends to develop over extended periods. High-impact economic announcements occur 15 to 20 times per month across major currency pairs and indices.
-
According to Seacrest Markets, 80% of prop firms restrict news trading during high-impact events, either through outright prohibitions or tightened execution windows. The minority of firms that allow it often impose constraints such as profit caps, reduced splits, or consistency requirements that surface only after traders trigger violations or request payouts.
-
Prop trading reached a $12 billion market in 2025, driven partly by traders seeking structured access to capital during volatile conditions. The separation between personal and funded capital changes the psychological equation during news events, allowing traders to execute strategies without the emotional interference that comes from watching personal savings fluctuate wildly during Federal Reserve announcements or nonfarm payroll releases.
-
Firms that genuinely support news trading invest in infrastructure that handles execution during volatility spikes without catastrophic slippage, which matters more than policy flexibility if poor execution quality turns correct directional calls into losses. Requesting historical execution data from other traders who've used the platform during major releases reveals patterns in how spreads widen.
-
The most common friction point between traders and prop firms isn't whether news trading is allowed, but how the firm handles losses during high-impact events. Some firms count stop losses triggered during news windows as normal drawdowns, while others apply multipliers or separate categories that effectively penalize participation in volatile windows even when the strategy is technically permitted, and execution was disciplined.
TradingPilot centralizes the comparison process across the best prop trading firms, letting traders filter by news trading policies, review execution quality feedback during volatile events, and see which platforms align with specific strategy requirements without piecing together information from scattered sources.
What is News Trading?
News trading is the practice of positioning yourself around scheduled or unexpected market-moving announcements to capture profit from the volatility that follows. It's not about predicting the news itself. It's about forecasting how the market will react to that news and acting decisively before, during, or immediately after the announcement. Timing becomes everything because the window between announcement and price movement can close in seconds.
Most traders focus on high-impact releases, such as:
-
Federal Reserve interest rate decisions
-
Nonfarm payroll reports
-
GDP data
-
Geopolitical events
These moments create sudden liquidity shifts and price swings that can move markets 50 pips or more within minutes. You're not waiting for trends to develop over days. You're capturing the immediate reaction when volatility spikes and spreads widen.
The Mechanics: Positioning Before the Storm
News traders typically operate in two windows. The first is pre-announcement positioning, where you enter trades based on expected market direction before the data drops. This requires reading sentiment, understanding historical reactions to similar announcements, and accepting that you're trading probabilities, not certainties. The second window is post-announcement execution, where you wait for the data release and trade the immediate price reaction. This approach demands fast execution, tight risk controls, and the ability to read momentum as it unfolds in real time.
Both approaches require discipline. You're not guessing. You're making informed assumptions about direction and magnitude based on market structure, previous patterns, and the specific nature of the announcement. Traders who succeed in this space understand that volatility creates opportunity, but it also magnifies mistakes. A poorly timed entry during a news event can trigger stop-outs more quickly than in any other trading scenario.
Why News Trading Gets Misunderstood
Many traders avoid news entirely because they've been told it's too risky or unpredictable. That caution isn't unfounded. Spreads can widen dramatically during high-impact releases, slippage becomes common, and stop losses may execute far from intended levels.
But avoiding news altogether means ignoring some of the most liquid and tradable moments in the market. Institutional traders don't sit out during Federal Reserve announcements. They position around them using structured strategies and risk controls.
Navigating Diverse News Trading Policies
The confusion often stems from conflicting advice. Some prop firms prohibit news trading to protect their liquidity providers and avoid mass stop-hunting clusters. Others allow it because they recognize that skilled traders can exploit defined price reactions when rules are clear, and risk limits are enforced.
Neither approach is inherently better. They reflect different risk philosophies. The problem arises when firms don't clearly communicate their stance, leaving traders uncertain about what's permitted and what will trigger a violation.
The Legitimacy Question: Scam or Strategy?
A persistent myth circulates in trading communities: if a prop firm allows news trading, it must be a scam or poorly managed. This belief usually comes from isolated negative experiences or superficial policy comparisons. The reality is more nuanced. Firms that permit news trading aren't ignoring risk. They're measuring trader skill across all market conditions, including volatile ones, and they've built controls to ensure traders can participate safely.
Conditional News Trading and Risk Parameters
Legitimate firms that allow news trading typically impose strict conditions. You might be prohibited from holding positions overnight into a scheduled announcement. Spread tolerances may tighten, requiring you to accept wider execution conditions during news. Daily drawdown limits still apply, even when volatility spikes.
These aren't loopholes. They're structured risk parameters designed to let traders operate in high-volatility environments without exposing the firm to unmanageable losses. The real marker of legitimacy isn't whether a firm allows or prohibits news trading. It's transparency.
Transparency and Policy Integrity
Reputable firms clearly publish their news trading rules:
-
What's permitted
-
What are the limits
-
How spreads and slippage are treated
-
Whether stop-losses executed during news count toward drawdowns
When firms hide these details or change policies mid-challenge, that's when distrust is justified. But the presence of a clear news trading policy signals confidence in both the firm's risk model and the trader's ability to follow structured rules.
But knowing the rules is one thing. Understanding why news trading matters to your profitability is another.
Related Reading
How Does News Trading Benefit Prop Traders
News trading offers prop traders a concentrated profit window that doesn't exist in ordinary market conditions. High-impact economic announcements compress days of potential price movement into minutes, creating opportunities to capture significant gains without waiting for trends to develop. You're using someone else's capital to exploit these volatile moments, which changes the entire risk equation compared to trading your own account.
Capturing Volatility Without Personal Risk
The most immediate advantage is simple: you're not risking your own money. When nonfarm payroll data drops or the Federal Reserve announces a rate decision, spreads widen, prices whipsaw, and stop-losses can be triggered in chaotic sequences. If you're trading personal capital, that volatility threatens your savings.
With a funded account, you're operating inside a structured risk framework where the firm absorbs the capital exposure while you focus entirely on execution. Your downside is capped at the challenge fee or monthly subscription. Your upside scales with the account size you've earned access to.
Psychological Buffers and Emotional Discipline
This separation matters psychologically. Traders who've managed both personal and funded accounts often report that news trading feels less emotionally charged when it's not their mortgage payment on the line. You can hold positions through volatile swings without the panic that comes from watching your own savings fluctuate wildly.
The firm's capital acts as a buffer, allowing you to execute your strategy without the emotional interference that destroys discipline during high-stress moments.
Frequency Creates Compounding Opportunity
According to For Traders, prop trading reached a $12B market in 2025, driven partly by traders seeking structured access to capital during volatile conditions. High-impact news events occur 15 to 20 times per month across major currency pairs and indices. Each event represents a discrete trading window where prepared traders can capitalize on predictable price reactions.
On a $100K funded account, these windows can generate $8,000 to $15,000 in monthly opportunities if you're disciplined about entry timing, risk management, and position sizing.
Compounding Experience and Frequent Opportunity
That frequency compounds over time. You're not waiting for quarterly earnings or annual policy shifts. You're engaging with scheduled volatility multiple times per week, which means more repetitions to refine your execution, more data points to validate your strategy, and more chances to recover from losses within the same month.
Firms that allow news trading recognize this rhythm and build their risk controls around it rather than prohibiting participation entirely.
Strategic Flexibility During Live Events
Firms that permit news trading give you the freedom to open, close, or adjust positions during live economic releases. This isn't about gambling in direction. It's about reading momentum as it unfolds and reacting to price behavior in real time. You can scale into positions as volatility confirms your thesis, tighten stops as momentum shifts, or exit entirely if the reaction contradicts your setup.
That flexibility doesn't exist when firms impose blanket restrictions that force you to close all positions 15 minutes before announcements and prohibit re-entry until volatility subsides.
Tactical Execution and Strategic Flexibility
Experienced traders use this freedom to layer strategies. You might enter a small position before the announcement to capture the initial spike, then add size post-release if momentum confirms direction. Or you might wait entirely for the data drop, then trade the retracement after the initial overreaction. Both approaches require the ability to act during the event itself, not just in the calm periods between announcements.
But having the freedom to trade news doesn't mean much if you don't know how to structure your approach within the firm's specific rules.
How to Trade News in a Prop Firm
Trading news in a prop firm environment requires a structured approach that respects both volatility and the firm's risk parameters. You're operating under daily drawdown limits, consistency requirements, and execution conditions that don't exist when trading your own capital.
The method you choose determines whether you capitalize on volatility or get stopped out before the move even develops. Your preparation starts before the calendar event appears and extends through post-release execution.
Monitor Economic Calendars as Your Foundation
Building a news trading plan begins with knowing when high-impact events occur. Platforms like Forex Factory, MyFXBook, and Investing.com publish scheduled release dates in advance, categorized by expected market impact. Mark Federal Reserve decisions, nonfarm payroll reports, GDP announcements, and central bank statements as priority events.
These create the largest liquidity shifts and the most tradable price reactions. Your daily trading plan should be structured around these releases, not treat them as interruptions to your regular strategy.
Sentiment Analysis and Market Context
The calendar tells you when volatility arrives. What it doesn't tell you is how the market will react. That requires reading sentiment before the announcement drops. Look at analyst expectations, consensus forecasts, recent trend direction, and how the price behaved in the hours leading up to the release.
If EUR/USD has been climbing for three days ahead of an ECB decision and analyst forecasts lean dovish, you're watching for a potential sentiment reversal. Context shapes your directional bias and helps you anticipate whether the market will confirm expectations or violently reject them.
Choose Your Execution Method Based on Firm Rules
Three primary approaches exist for trading news events, each with different risk profiles and compatibility with prop firm constraints. Pre-news positioning involves entering trades before the data release based on technical setups and sentiment analysis.
This method captures the full price move but exposes you to maximum slippage and spread widening. Some firms prohibit holding positions in scheduled announcements entirely, which eliminates this approach regardless of your preference.
Volatility Capture and Execution Speed
The straddle strategy places simultaneous buy-stop and sell-stop orders above and below the current price, designed to catch the breakout in whichever direction momentum confirms. You're not predicting direction. You're positioning to profit from volatility itself. This requires fast execution and the ability to cancel the opposing order immediately after it triggers.
Execution speed becomes critical because hesitation leaves you exposed to whipsaws that trigger both stops within seconds.
The Post-Retracement Continuation Strategy
Post-news trading waits for the initial spike, observes the retracement, and enters on the continuation move. This approach avoids the widest spreads and most chaotic price action, making it the safest method for funded accounts where daily drawdown limits leave no room for execution errors.
You sacrifice the first 20 to 30 pips of movement in exchange for clearer entry signals and tighter risk control. Many experienced prop traders prefer this method because it aligns profitability with the firm's risk tolerance rather than fighting against it.
Reduce Position Sizing During Volatile Windows
The fundamental rule for news trading in prop environments is simple: trade smaller during announcements than you do during regular market hours. Slippage can double your intended stop loss distance within seconds. Spreads widen from 1 pip to 8 pips on major pairs during Federal Reserve decisions.
One poorly timed entry can trigger an instant stop-out that consumes 3% of your account before you process what happened. Prop traders typically risk 0.2% to 0.5% per trade during news events, compared to 1% to 1.5% during standard conditions.
Restricted Access and Controlled Sizing
According to Seacrest Markets, 80% of prop firms restrict news trading during high-impact events, either through outright prohibitions or tightened execution windows. The firms that do allow it expect traders to demonstrate control through conservative sizing and disciplined exits.
Smaller positions protect you from catastrophic drawdowns while still capturing meaningful profit when momentum confirms your thesis. This isn't timidity. It's recognition that volatility magnifies both opportunity and error, and funded accounts penalize the latter permanently.
But knowing how to execute new trades means nothing if the firm you're working with doesn't permit the strategy in the first place.
Related Reading
How to Choose Prop Firms That Allow News Trading
Start with the firm's published rules on news trading before you evaluate anything else.
Some firms state their position clearly in their terms
-
Whether you can hold positions through scheduled announcements
-
Which events trigger restrictions
-
How spreads or slippage during volatility affect your drawdown calculation
Others bury the details in FAQ sections or leave the policy intentionally vague. If you can't find explicit guidance on news trading within five minutes of reviewing their documentation, that ambiguity will become a problem the moment you execute a trade during Federal Reserve announcements and face an unexpected violation.
Read the Fine Print on Drawdown Treatment
The most common friction point isn't whether news trading is allowed. It's how the firm handles losses arising from high-impact events. Some firms treat any stop-loss triggered during news windows as a normal drawdown, which keeps your risk calculations consistent across all trading conditions.
Hidden Penalties and Policy Clarity
Others apply multipliers or separate drawdown categories for news-related losses, effectively penalizing you for participating in volatile windows even when the strategy is technically permitted. According to TradingView News, 90% of prop firms restrict trading during major news events, which means the minority that allows it often imposes hidden constraints that surface only after you've triggered a violation.
Ask directly: Does a 2% loss during nonfarm payroll count the same as a 2% loss during regular market hours? If the firm can't answer that question clearly, you're operating without a real risk framework.
Verify Execution Quality During Volatile Windows
Firms that genuinely support news trading invest in infrastructure that handles execution during volatility spikes without catastrophic slippage. Request historical execution data from other traders who've used the platform during Federal Reserve decisions or GDP releases. Look for patterns in how spreads widen, whether stop-losses execute within a reasonable distance of intended levels, and if the platform remains stable when liquidity thins.
Poor execution quality during news events doesn't just cost you individual trades. It creates an environment where even correct directional calls result in losses because the infrastructure can't support the strategy the firm claims to permit.
Compare Multiple Firms Using Structured Criteria
Most traders evaluate prop firms one at a time, which makes it nearly impossible to spot which policies are industry standard and which are unusually restrictive.
Comparing firms side by side reveals patterns:
-
Whether overnight holding restrictions are universal or firm-specific
-
How profit splits change as account size scales
-
Which platforms offer the clearest documentation around news trading limits
Platform Comparison and Policy Transparency
TradingPilot centralizes this comparison process, letting you filter firms by their news trading policies, review trader feedback on execution quality during volatile events, and see which platforms align with your specific strategy requirements.
You're not guessing which firm might be a good fit. You're identifying which ones publish transparent rules, enforce them consistently, and provide the infrastructure to support high-volatility execution without penalizing disciplined risk management.
But finding firms with clear policies is only half the equation. The other half is knowing which specific platforms actually deliver on those promises when volatility hits.
Top 10 Prop Firms that Allow News Trading in 2026
The firms that permit news trading fall into three categories:
-
Those with minimal restrictions during the evaluation and funded phases.
-
Those that impose time-based blackouts or profit caps once you're funded.
-
Those with hybrid models where rules shift depending on account type or challenge path.
Each approach reflects a different risk philosophy, and your choice depends on whether you prioritize execution freedom during volatile windows or prefer conservative policies that reduce scrutiny on high-impact trades.
1. FTMO
FTMO allows unrestricted news trading during the evaluation phase, which gives you full freedom to test your strategy across all market conditions before committing to their funded model. Once you transition to a funded account, a two-minute blackout period applies before and after major news releases on certain currency pairs.
The restriction targets high-impact events, such as Federal Reserve decisions and nonfarm payroll reports, not every scheduled announcement on the economic calendar.
Account Models and Execution Windows
Swing accounts operate under entirely different rules. You can hold positions through news events and weekends without triggering violations, which makes FTMO's swing model compatible with longer-term strategies that don't rely on intraday execution. The two-minute buffer on standard accounts protects the firm's liquidity providers from mass stop-hunting clusters during volatility spikes, but it also means you can't enter or exit trades during the most liquid moments of a news release.
The policy is balanced in that it doesn't prohibit news trading outright, but it does require you to either position before the blackout window or wait until volatility subsides. Traders who rely on post-news continuation moves can work within this framework. Scalpers who need to react during the initial spike will find the restriction limiting.
2. Apex Trader Funding
Apex Trader Funding permits news trading but prohibits taking opposing positions around the same event. You can't simultaneously hold long and short trades on the same instrument during a Federal Reserve announcement, which eliminates hedging strategies designed to capture breakouts in both directions. The firm enforces this through automated detection systems that flag bracket orders or straddle setups opened in the proximity of scheduled releases.
Profit Consistency and Diversification Requirements
They also impose a consistency rule: no more than 30% of your total monthly profits can come from news-related trades. This prevents traders from relying exclusively on high-impact events to meet profit targets while ignoring risk management during regular market hours. The rule forces diversification across multiple trading windows, which aligns with how institutional traders operate but restricts those who specialize in event-driven strategies.
The 30% cap isn't arbitrary. It reflects Apex's belief that sustainable profitability comes from consistent execution across varied conditions, not from isolated volatility bets. If your entire strategy centers on Federal Reserve decisions and GDP releases, this firm will penalize that approach even if your directional calls are accurate.
3. FundedNext
FundedNext allows news trading but reduces your profit split to 40% on any trade opened or closed within five minutes of a high-impact event. The standard profit split is 80% to 95%, depending on your account tier, which means news trades become significantly less profitable even when your execution is flawless. You're not prohibited from participating, but the financial incentive structure discourages it.
The five-minute window includes both pre-news positioning and post-news exits. If you enter a trade four minutes before the nonfarm payroll data drops and close it three minutes after, you keep 40% of the profit instead of 80%. The firm doesn't notify you in real time when this reduction applies. You discover it during payout processing, which creates friction if you weren't tracking event proximity during execution.
Profit Caps and Strategy Sustainability
For traders who occasionally catch news-driven moves as part of a broader strategy, the 40% split might be acceptable. For those who structure their entire approach around scheduled volatility, FundedNext's model makes profitability unsustainable. The policy exists to protect the firm from traders who exploit high-leverage conditions during news spikes, but it penalizes disciplined execution just as much as reckless speculation.
4. Goat Funded Trader
Goat Funded Trader caps news-related profits at 1% of your opening balance per event. If you're trading a $100,000 account and generate $3,000 from a trade executed within two minutes of a major announcement, the firm removes the excess $2,000 from your payout. The restriction applies only to trades opened or closed during the two-minute window, not to positions held through the event that were established earlier.
Profit Thresholds and Risk-Reward Dynamics
The 1% cap doesn't trigger violations or disqualifications. You won't lose your funded account for exceeding it. You simply forfeit the profit above the threshold, which means your risk-reward calculation changes dramatically during news windows. A trade that would normally justify a 3:1 reward-to-risk ratio becomes capped at 1:1 or worse, depending on your position size and the magnitude of the price move.
Traders who prefer conservative execution appreciate this policy because it eliminates the temptation to over-leverage during volatile moments. Those who've built strategies around capturing full breakout moves find the cap frustrating, especially when their directional analysis proves correct, but profitability gets artificially limited. Goat Funded Trader's approach prioritizes safety over opportunity, which reflects their broader risk philosophy across all trading conditions.
5. The 5ers
The 5ers operate three distinct challenge programs, each with different news trading policies. Hyper-Growth and Bootcamp accounts allow news trading without time-based restrictions, though bracket strategies that place simultaneous buy and sell orders are prohibited. High Stakes accounts impose a two-minute blackout before and after high-impact releases, mirroring FTMO's approach but applying to fewer currency pairs.
Program-Specific Policies and Strategic Alignment
The inconsistency across programs creates confusion for traders who switch between account types or scale from one challenge to another. You might develop a news trading strategy that works perfectly in Bootcamp, only to discover it violates High Stakes rules once you upgrade. The firm's documentation addresses this, but traders often miss the distinctions until they trigger a violation.
If you're committed to news trading, Hyper-Growth or Bootcamp accounts provide the flexibility you need. High Stakes accounts suit traders who prefer conservative policies and don't rely on volatile execution windows. The challenge is knowing which program aligns with your strategy before you commit to the evaluation fee.
6. FundingPips
FundingPips has the most complex news trading policy in the industry. During evaluation, news trading is unrestricted. Once funded, profits are disallowed unless the trade was opened at least five hours before the news release and closed within five minutes of it. This narrow execution window makes it nearly impossible to profit from news-driven volatility under standard account conditions.
The "On Demand" reward cycle eliminates these restrictions entirely, allowing you to trade news however you prefer. The trade-off is that On-Demand accounts typically require higher evaluation fees or offer lower profit splits, so you're paying for flexibility at the expense of reduced earnings potential. FundingPips structures this as an optional upgrade, but it's effectively mandatory for traders whose strategies depend on news execution.
Policy Awareness and Payout Friction
Most traders discover these restrictions only after funding, which can be frustrating when profitable trades are disqualified during payout processing. CBS News reports that DNA Funded offers access to over 800 financial instruments, but instrument diversity means nothing if execution policies prevent you from trading them during the most liquid market conditions. FundingPips' model works if you understand the constraints upfront. If you don't, it becomes a source of unexpected friction.
7. QT Funded
QT Funded allows unrestricted news trading during evaluation, which lets you validate your strategy across all market conditions before transitioning to a funded account. Prime and Instant accounts impose a five-minute blackout before and after high-impact news once you're funded. The restriction applies to opening and closing trades but excludes stop losses and take profits, which means you can maintain existing positions through news events without manual intervention.
Blackout Windows and Transitioning Constraints
The five-minute buffer is wider than FTMO's two-minute window but narrower than firms that impose ten-minute restrictions. It gives you enough time to position before volatility spikes while preventing execution during the most chaotic price action. Traders who rely on post-news continuation moves can work within this framework by entering after the blackout period ends, and momentum confirms direction.
QT Funded's approach balances risk management with execution freedom, but the distinction between evaluation and funded rules creates a learning curve. You might develop a strategy during evaluation that becomes partially restricted once funded, which requires adjustments to your timing and position sizing.
8. OANDA Prop Trader
OANDA Prop Trader prohibits opening or closing trades two minutes before or after major economic events. Stop losses and take profits are excluded from this restriction, which means you can maintain risk controls on existing positions without manual intervention during news releases. The policy is conservative and designed to prevent traders from exploiting high-leverage conditions during volatility spikes.
The two-minute buffer discourages aggressive event-driven strategies but doesn't eliminate news trading entirely.
Execution Quality and Timing Adjustments
You can position before the blackout window or enter after volatility subsides, which suits traders who prefer post-news continuation setups over initial breakout execution. OANDA's infrastructure handles execution quality well during volatile periods, which matters more than the restriction itself if you're focused on consistent profitability rather than capturing every pip of a news-driven move.
Traders who've operated under OANDA's policies report that the restriction becomes invisible once you adjust your timing. The firm's transparency around enforcement and execution quality compensates for the limited flexibility during high-impact windows.
9. Aqua Funded
Aqua Funded operates out of Dubai and distinguishes itself through a dual-scaling system that allows accounts to grow to $4 million. The firm has paid over $2.9 million to more than 42,000 traders, which establishes credibility in a market where payout transparency remains inconsistent. Aqua Funded offers multiple challenge paths, including 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, and Instant Funding options, catering to traders with different experience levels and risk tolerances.
The scaling mechanism is straightforward: achieve 12% profit within three months, and your account balance increases by 25%. Simultaneously, you progress through the Aqua Elite program with Bronze, Silver, and Gold tiers, each unlocking additional benefits beyond standard profit sharing. Traders benefit from up to 95% profit splits with bi-weekly payouts, and the firm offers a first payout option in just seven days for those who need faster access to earnings.
Platform Flexibility and Transparent Policy
Aqua Funded supports multiple trading platforms, including cTrader, Match Trader, MT5, and TradeLocker, which provide flexibility across various trading styles and execution preferences. The firm backs its payouts with a 48-hour payment guarantee, demonstrating a commitment to trader satisfaction.
News trading policies at Aqua Funded are less restrictive than those of firms like OANDA or FTMO, though specific time-based buffers apply during high-impact events. The firm's documentation addresses these constraints clearly, which reduces the risk of unexpected violations during funded execution.
10. DNA Funded
DNA Funded operates under ASIC licensing through DNA Markets, which brings broker-grade trading conditions to the proprietary trading space. The Australian firm offers traders access to capital through three primary challenge types: 1 Phase, 2 Phase, and Rapid Challenge, plus an Instant Funding option that allows traders to skip evaluation phases entirely. Account sizes range from $5,000 to $200,000, with maximum funding allocation reaching $600,000 per trader.
The standard profit split is 80%, with an optional upgrade to 90% available as an add-on. DNA Funded operates on TradeLocker, which integrates with TradingView for advanced charting capabilities. The platform supports various trading styles, including news trading, though a ten-minute restriction applies around major releases.
Execution Stability and Regulatory Credibility
This buffer is wider than most competitors, which limits execution during the most volatile price action but provides more flexibility than firms with complete blackout periods.
DNA Funded's infrastructure consistently maintains execution quality during volatile windows, which matters more than the restriction itself if your strategy focuses on post-news continuation rather than initial breakout capture. The firm's regulatory backing from ASIC adds credibility that many offshore prop firms lack, thereby reducing counterparty risk during payout processing.
But knowing which firms allow news trading doesn't tell you how to evaluate whether their specific restrictions actually fit your execution style.
Finding the Right Prop Firm for News Trading Doesn't Have to Be Confusing
Selecting a prop firm isn't just about confirming they allow news trading. You need to verify that risk limits, profit splits, execution infrastructure, and policy enforcement align with how you actually trade. Many traders waste weeks testing platforms, only to discover hidden restrictions when making their first payout request or after triggering an unexpected violation during a Federal Reserve announcement.
Most traders evaluate firms sequentially, reading through terms one platform at a time and trying to remember which policies felt reasonable three firms ago. This approach makes it impossible to spot which restrictions are standard across the industry and which are unusually punitive. You end up choosing based on incomplete comparisons, which leads to mismatched expectations once you're funded and executing live trades during volatile windows.
Compare Policies Across Multiple Dimensions Simultaneously
TradingPilot solves this by centralizing the comparison process, so you can filter firms by their news-trading policies, review execution-quality feedback from active traders, and see how drawdown treatment differs across platforms. You're not piecing together information from scattered forum posts or outdated blog reviews.
You're viewing structured data that shows which firms enforce rules transparently, how profit splits change as you scale, and whether their infrastructure handles volatility without catastrophic slippage. This eliminates the guesswork that causes traders to fund accounts with firms whose policies contradict their execution style.
Evaluate Beyond Surface-Level Permissions
Firms can technically allow news trading while imposing profit caps, reduced splits, or consistency requirements that make the strategy unprofitable. You need to see how these constraints interact with your position sizing, typical hold times, and monthly profit targets. A firm that caps news profits at 1% per event might work perfectly if you trade 15 events per month with conservative sizing. That same cap becomes restrictive if your strategy relies on capturing three large moves quarterly.
The difference between a productive funded relationship and constant friction comes down to matching your execution rhythm with the firm's risk tolerance. Visit TradingPilot to compare the most reliable prop firms that permit news trading, evaluate them against your specific strategy requirements, and choose a platform that supports your growth without penalizing disciplined execution during volatile market conditions.
Related Reading
• Prop Firms With No Minimum Trading Days
• How Much Do Funded Traders Make
• Prop Firms With No Time Limit
• Largest Prop Trading Firms
• Funded Account Brokers
• Are Funded Accounts Legit